Show summary Hide summary
When the Green Bay Packers and Dallas Cowboys meet again this Sunday, they’ll be playing out the next chapter of a blockbuster trade that has yet to produce a clear winner. More than a year after Dallas sent star edge rusher Micah Parsons to Green Bay for two first-round picks and defensive tackle Kenny Clark, both franchises are still chasing the outcomes they expected.
Packers still waiting for a full return on their investment
Green Bay traded for Parsons and immediately committed to him with a four-year, $188 million extension, signaling a short-term push for a championship. The move drew comparisons to past aggressive Green Bay additions that preceded Super Bowl runs.
Practical steps to change what Claude remembers
How the College Football Playoff reached 24 teams and reshaped the bracket
Early on, the trade looked promising. Parsons made an immediate impact, helping the Packers open with convincing wins and contributing to a 9-3-1 start. He was playing at an elite level before a December injury changed the trajectory.
On Dec. 14, Parsons suffered a torn ACL in a loss to the Broncos, ending his season. The Packers stumbled after that, losing their final four regular-season games and entering the playoffs as a No. 7 seed. In their wild-card game they carried a 21–6 lead into the fourth quarter, only to surrender the advantage and exit the postseason with a 31–27 loss.
Offseason roster moves offered limited reinforcements. With cap space reduced and no first-round pick tied up in the swap, Green Bay lost several contributors and made modest additions, including linebacker Zaire Franklin. The team banked on Parsons as the primary upgrade to vault them back into contention.
Availability, however, has been the sticking point. Through the first four weeks of the 2026 season the Packers were 2–2 while struggling in several areas unrelated to Parsons’s recovery. A thin offensive line has hampered protection for quarterback Jordan Love, and the running game has faltered amid Josh Jacobs’s absence under the commissioner’s exempt list, leaving the Packers near the bottom of the league in rushing output.
Still, there are signs of life. A recent 31–7 win over the Bears offered a momentum boost, and Parsons remains under contract through 2029, giving Green Bay a multiyear window to build around him once he returns. For now, though, the team has work to do before it can claim the trade paid immediate dividends.
Re-grade: C-
Cowboys’ gamble to redistribute talent has not paid off
Dallas drafted Parsons at No. 12 in 2021, a decision that quickly looked like a steal. He transitioned from a college linebacker role to an NFL pass rusher and produced elite numbers, including double-digit sacks and multiple All-Pro recognitions in his early seasons.
Rather than extend him before his final rookie year, negotiations collapsed amid public tensions: a trade request from Parsons, visible disengagement during a preseason appearance, and critical comments from owner Jerry Jones. The Cowboys ultimately traded him and converted the assets into several roster moves.
Dallas used the picks acquired in the Parsons deal to trade for defensive tackle Quinnen Williams at the 2025 deadline and to select edge Malachi Lawrence, corner Devin Moore and defensive lineman LT Overton. Williams was later signed to a three-year, $105.9 million extension.
Yet the defense has deteriorated. After ranking near the middle of the league in previous seasons, the Cowboys fell to the bottom in key defensive metrics following Parsons’s departure. Statistical indicators such as defensive EPA per play and opponent success rate moved in the wrong direction from 2024 to 2025, coinciding with the departure of defensive coordinator Dan Quinn to Washington.
The front office also invested in secondary help, signing cornerback DaRon Bland to a four-year, $92 million deal shortly after trading Parsons. Combined annual spending on Williams and Bland now exceeds what Parsons is being paid by roughly $11.8 million per year, yet their collective impact has not matched Parsons’s individual production.
Coaching changes have not immediately improved results. Dallas hired Christian Parker as defensive coordinator, but the unit remained ineffective early in the 2026 season. The team has taken internal steps — including a players-only meeting and the addition of veteran coach Mike Pettine as a defensive assistant — to address the slide.
One stated rationale from ownership for the trade was to shore up the run defense. In practice, that objective has not been realized; Dallas ranked last in rushing yards allowed per game, and the new personnel have not restored a consistent run-stopping identity.
For a franchise trying to capitalize on the peak years of quarterback Dak Prescott and an explosive offense, keeping Parsons might have offered a clearer path to a near-term championship. Instead, the Cowboys appear to be paying for depth and flexibility while suffering a marked decline on the defensive side.
Re-grade: F
