Show summary Hide summary
British parliamentarians are urging the BBC to stop using licence-fee funds to outbid commercial rivals for overseas TV shows, saying the practice offers poor value for the public. The recommendation comes as the BBC prepares for charter and funding negotiations that could reshape how it is paid for.
Lawmakers side with commercial broadcasters
A cross-party committee of MPs on the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee has criticised the BBC for competing with private broadcasters when acquiring foreign programmes. ITV, Sky and Channel 4 have complained that the corporation’s use of the licence fee to win shows such as Schitt’s Creek distorts the market.
Ultra-thin women smoking cigarettes are making a comeback as a fashion trend
Windows Memory Diagnostic explained: what the test does and how to read results
The committee said it understood why the BBC might seek titles that attract audiences, particularly younger viewers. But it warned that, given tight finances, the corporation should not be “paying over the odds for overseas content,” especially when bidding against commercial UK broadcasters. “We do not believe that this provides value for money for the licence fee payer,” the report concluded.
BBC defends acquisitions but flags a review
When BBC director general Matt Brittin appeared before the committee in July he defended the strategy, saying foreign buys account for under 5% of the broadcaster’s content budget and can help funnel viewers to public-service programming.
Labour MP Natasha Irons challenged him directly, asking: “What’s the public service value in outbidding commercial broadcasters for things like Scooby‑Doo when you could be investing in Britain?” Brittin replied that the BBC would reconsider acquisition spending in light of a planned cost-cutting programme, noting, “That’s something I’m looking at reviewing as part of the cost savings.”
Commercials push for tighter charter rules
ITV has repeatedly raised the issue in submissions to the committee. In writing, the broadcaster said: “We can see no reason for the BBC to use public funds to compete for content that would otherwise find a home on free-to-access commercial services.”
ITV asked the government to add a rule to the BBC charter limiting public-service spending on non-UK acquired content, except where the BBC acts as purchaser of last resort, and to increase transparency about the titles it buys.
Debate over the licence fee and alternative levies
The committee also used its report to press for changes to how the BBC is financed. It recommended the government consider widening the scope of the licence fee during charter renewal so it is “no longer be linked to a particular device or activity.”
Report authors argued that broadening the fee could bring more households into the funding base and raise revenue, provided the cost of an individual licence was reduced and the BBC’s financial sustainability remained intact.
Lawmakers also urged ministers to remain open to a household-style levy — for example, adding a BBC charge to a utility or broadband bill. The BBC has signalled it is willing to consider such options, though ministers have repeatedly rejected the idea so far.
Committee chair issues a stark warning
Caroline Dinenage, who chairs the committee, described the moment as critical for the broadcaster. “This is a pivotal moment for the BBC,” she said, warning that continuing on the current path risks “managed decline” for a national institution that supports the creative economy and public life.
She added that despite frustrations with the corporation, its cultural and democratic contributions are sizeable: “Like a much-loved family member, we may criticise and grumble about the BBC but we would miss it enormously if it were no longer here for us.”
